The indictment of Governor Rick Perry by a randomly selected
grand jury prompted the Texas Tribune to look at the way Texas grand juries are
typically selected. At first glance, nothing about a randomly selected grand
jury raises any questions. However, many would be surprised to learn that’s not
typically how many areas of the Lonestar State choose to handle their grand
jury selection.
Texas allows judges in each county to pick between methods
of random selection and what is called the key man system. A large number of
counties in Texas actually use the key man system, or "pick-a-pal"
method as critics often refer to it. This type of selection involves the judge
appointing a commissioner compiling lists of anywhere from 15-40 people to be
summoned. The name refers to the fact, that there’s a very high chance
commissioners could know the individuals they are summoning to serve on grand
jury. This of course may not be the case, but is in completely in contrast to
the thousands of randomly selected names generated by the state for jury trial
service. Qualifications for the individuals chosen are set out in Art. 19.08
of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
Deciding which method to use is largely a matter of
experience, but many are saying that due to not only perceived bias, but also a
very real possibility of bias in a key man system, it’s time for Texas Courts
to uniformly adopt random jury selection across all stages of the process. It
begs the question though, if we have so much fuss about jury service for the
trial, how will we get fair grand jurors who have been asked to commit
themselves to two days a week for up to three months?
There’s strong opposition from supporters of key man
systems, and they argue that done correctly, “the way we’ve always done it
works well.” Further, to take the time to voir dire a panel, and find 12 people
to commit to be fair and impartial for three months, while they hear case after
case could potentially slow the already case heavy courts.
Arguments on both sides are strong, which make it clear the
usually super-secret grand jury process need be discussed more in light of more
concern with juror behavior and bias. Additionally, I suppose we can add grand
jury analysis, alongside
this, to the list of things that came out of the Perry indictment.
*For a prosecutor’s
take on the grand jury proceeding process you can also visit this article from
the Texas District and County Attorneys Association:
http://www.tdcaa.com/journal/grand-jury-where-community-meets-law
No comments:
Post a Comment